| Re: Schema version 1.00 RC1 released [message #100 is a reply to message #98] |
Tue, 28 September 2004 16:02   |
Matthias Hengartner
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2003
|
Member |
|
|
Hello again,
here the rest of my remarks about V1.00 RC1 for the present:
- In the <connection>-element, we have the attribute "branchTopologyIDRef".
We should rename it in "branchInfrastructureIDRef", since we refer to
another <infrastructure> with an "infrastructureID". (It think this
inconsistency bases on a former proposal of mine).
- In the current version of "Bildungsvorschrift für railML-Teilschemen"
(Creating Instructions for railML partial
schemes) from Nils Poldrack
(www.railml.org/documents/general/creatinginstructions_ger_R C1.pdf), section
3.5.6 "Bezeichner"/"Abkürzungen" ("designators"/"abbreviations"), there
is(among other) the following rule:
* Abbreviations or contractions may not be used as part of designator names
---> this rule collides with different designators in the infrastructure
schema (e.g. infraAttrGroup, ocp***, dir, posOnNet, absPos, .......)
It's not my opinion that we have to rename these designators, but perhaps we
should change the wording of this rule ("should not" instead of "may not").
- And finally, there are some missprints in the demofile (for those who
already use it):
1. branchTrackIDRef "B-SW13-SW14" should be "C-SW13-SW14"
2. branchTrackIDRef "B-SW17-SW18" should be "C-SW17-SW18"
3. crossection of track "A-4" at km 50.313 should have ocpIDRef "A" haben
(not "D")
4. branchIDRef "SW26L" (in track "A-4") should be "SW29L"
5. and EndTrackD-4 is an "empty" <simpleConnection>. By intention?
(Ulli, I'll send you the demofile with points 1. to 4. corrected, so you
don't have to do the work that I've already done.)
Have a nice evening
Matthias Hengartner
-----------------------------
Matthias Hengartner
IVT ETH Zürich
++ 41 1 633 31 09
hengartner(at)ivtbaugethzch
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
