Forum
Login
Forum: railML.infrastructure » [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
Home
Introduction
User
Developers
Public relations
railML.org
Forum
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
Home
»
railML newsgroups
»
railML.infrastructure
»
[railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
Show:
Today's Messages
::
Show Polls
::
Message Navigator
E-mail to friend
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
[
message #2359
is a reply to
message #2353
]
Fri, 28 February 2020 15:56
Ferri Leberl
Messages:
24
Registered:
September 2016
Junior Member
Dear All,
I just adapted the examples under
https://wiki2.railml.org/index.php?title=IS:signal#Signal
I hope, it matches your point.
Yours, Ferri
Report message to a moderator
[
Message index
]
[railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
Tobias Bregulla
on Sat, 25 January 2020 14:50
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
Torben Brand
on Tue, 25 February 2020 10:21
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
Thomas Nygreen
on Wed, 26 February 2020 16:59
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
christian.rahmig
on Wed, 26 February 2020 20:00
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
Ferri Leberl
on Fri, 28 February 2020 15:56
Re: [railML2] Clearer modelling of the signal designation
By:
Thomas Nygreen
on Wed, 04 March 2020 17:30
Previous Topic:
extension of <levelCrossing> in railML2.4nor
Next Topic:
the use of @dir in railML.
Goto Forum:
- railML newsgroups
railML.infrastructure
railml.interlocking
railml.common
railml.rollingstock
railml.timetable
Testforum
- RailTopoModel newsgroup
RailTopoModel
-=]
Back to Top
[=-
[
Syndicate this forum (XML)
] [
] [
]
Current Time:
Tue Jul 23 01:11:53 CEST 2024