Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC [message #2487 is a reply to message #2442] |
Mon, 06 July 2020 16:28 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 465 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
railML 3.2 shall contain an option to model Radio Block Centers (RBC). After we discussed required parameters in the ETCS use case working group, we now face the central question: shall we add RBC in infrastructure or interlocking/signalling domain? What does the community think about it?
Any comments are highly appreciated...
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|