Christian Rahmig <coord(at)infrastructurerailMLorg> wrote:
> Dear Torben, dear all,
>
> in order to be quite close to the railML 3.x model, I
> suggest to modify the approach:
>
> Instead of <balise>@switchable, we can also define a new
> attribute <balise>@type with values "controlled" and
> "fixed".
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best regards
> Christian
Dear Christian,
This makes sense.
Also I will not bicker with the coordinators when it comes to the terms..
;-)