[railML3] Signalled braking distance of a line (de: Regelbremsweg einer Strecke) [message #2980] |
Wed, 30 March 2022 11:34 |
Michael Gruschwitz
Messages: 13 Registered: May 2020
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Dear colleagues!
As part of the joint work in our BMDV funded research project "Indres"
we at Bahnkonzept came across the requirement to exchange what in
Germany is called “Regelbremsweg”. It is usually the distance between
the main signal and the matching distant signal. It is usually also
referred to as the maximum braking distance of a train the lineside
signaling is based on. An english expression for this braking distance
the lineside signalling is based on could be "signalled braking
distance" of a line.
We are aware that there are a lot of railways that do not follow the
idea of a uniform standard braking distance set for a line, however we
think that for those who do it should be possible to exchange this
information via railML.
We are also aware that it is already very late in the process of
preparing publishing of railML 3.2, nonetheless we would very much
appreciate if this requirement could still be considered to be included
this release.
What do you think? How could we support this?
Best regards,
--
Michael Gruschwitz
Bahnkonzept Dresden/Germany
P.S. For railML 2.5 we will try to model too, but in an own extension of
the standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [railML3] Signalled braking distance of a line (de: Regelbremsweg einer Strecke) [message #2995 is a reply to message #2986] |
Thu, 07 April 2022 13:59 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 474 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Dirk, dear all,
thank you very much for your feedback and for the important issues that you pointed to.
With regards to the naming, I want to follow a feedback by Prof. Pachl who suggested "signalled braking distance". The attribute could be named @signalledBrakingDistance accordingly.
The remark that the signalled braking distance is direction-dependent and may very along a railway line, is crucial. In particular, this means that the implementation cannot be based on an attribute only. Here, we need to look for other solutions.
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|