Re: [raillML3] Revision of rulebook [message #3184 is a reply to message #3179] |
Fri, 05 January 2024 13:44 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 447 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Georg,
I agree with Thomas that major changes in the meaning of a rulebook entry should not occur without a changed rulebook register name.
However, the topic of versions, revisions etc. of registers and external documents will become relevant at other situations, too. Therefore, a general approach on how the schema can deal with these revisions and versions of external resources (not only in infrastructure, but maybe also in rollingstock or timetable) may be useful for future railML versions.
Any ideas or comments from the community?
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|