Re: [raillML3] Mounting information of signals [message #3186 is a reply to message #3183] |
Wed, 17 January 2024 17:15 |
Martin Zien
Messages: 14 Registered: December 2021
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello Christian, hello Georg,
yes, I can agree that such an extension makes sense and would be a useful completion of the set of information provided in railML 3.x.
If such information would be provided as machine readable input from an Infrastructure Manager, it's not necessary to collect it addtionally from documents like Basic Design Specifications or by Site Surveys.
Having it as optional element, would still allow the way of working in the conventional way, if necessary.
Would be interesting to read, what other members think in this matter.
Best regards
Martin Zien
(Siemens Mobility)
[Updated on: Wed, 17 January 2024 17:17] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|