Avalanche system and Derailment detection [message #3006] |
Wed, 01 June 2022 14:44 |
Georg Boasson
Messages: 18 Registered: October 2020
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Both detector@detects in Infrastructure and hasDetectorType@detectorType in Interlocking should be considered. detects="derailment" is missing and "avalanche" is defined for both attributes. How shall an avalanche area be defined? See the attached document for more details and examples.
[Updated on: Wed, 01 June 2022 15:38] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Avalanche system and Derailment detection [message #3013 is a reply to message #3006] |
Fri, 10 June 2022 14:52 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 465 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Georg,
thank you for your feedback on railML 3.2 and the detector element in particular. Indeed, the first implementation of the detector in railML 3.2 has still some potential for improvement harmonizing the aspects in IS and IL schema. Therefore, I filed a Git issue [1] in our railML development system in order not to forget about this topic in railML 3.3.
Question to the railML community: which kind of additional requirements do you have regarding the modelling of incident and natural hazard detectors? Any comment is highly appreciated...
[1] https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/508
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|
|