Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » [railML3] Positioning approach (How to define unambiguous positions with railML 3.x)
Re: [railML3] Positioning approach [message #3282 is a reply to message #3125] Mon, 26 August 2024 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ari Tilli is currently offline  Ari Tilli
Messages: 2
Registered: February 2024
Junior Member
Finnish ETCS project:

We plan to use the style of "Every NetElement has to have an associatedPositioningSystem linking to a so-called "intrinsic positioning system" usable as measuring tape"for all ETCS-related data".

Reason : This better matches the segment/offset model of various SA-designs, and also matches PlanPro-usage (IIRC).

If there are persons in the forum working in site data-tools for ETCS supplier, one could state if this is the way forward in their future railML (>=3.2) import tooling, so that we do not unnecessary listen to a supplier opposing this model.




Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [raillML3] Revision of rulebook
Next Topic: [railML2] Single and double derailer
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 02 12:27:26 CEST 2024