Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #859 is a reply to message #857] |
Thu, 08 November 2012 22:54 |
Susanne Wunsch railML
Messages: 0 Registered: January 2020
|
|
|
|
Dear Dirk,
Thanks for the example from the practice. :-)
Dirk Bräuer <dirkbraeuer(at)irfpde> writes:
> Susanne Wunsch wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be sufficient to refer to a certain 'trainPart' and an
>> 'ocp'? A 'trainPart' may traverse a certain 'ocp' only once. If it
>> changes its direction this should be defined as a distinct 'trainPart'.
>
> Unfortunately this is nowadays wrong. A train(part) may "traverse" an
> OCP more than once. I could mention plenty examples from practice, not
> only from Germany. For short, only one example which you can easily
> find at HAFAS: The CANTUS trains from Bebra to Göttingen and v. v.,
> stopping two times at Niederhone whith the same train number (24090,
> 24096 ff.).
But this train reverses at Eschwege. That means there should be at least
two train parts in order to define the reversed vehicle order. [1] It's
unfortunately not yet described in the wiki page of trainPart. [2] :-(
Kind regards...
Susanne
[1] http://trac.assembla.com/railML/ticket/142
[2] http://www.wiki.railml.org/index.php?title=TT:trainPart
--
Susanne Wunsch
Schema Coordinator: railML.common
|
|
|
|
|
RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 03 20:56:57 CET 2024
|