Home » railML newsgroups » railml.timetable » RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss [message #873 is a reply to message #870] |
Fri, 09 November 2012 16:11 |
Dirk Bräuer
Messages: 313 Registered: August 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear Susanne,
> It changes its running direction in Eschwege, that means "it reverses".
please do not mix the "trainReverse" attribute with the
"orientationReversed" attribute.
- "trainReverse" is an attribute of <ocpTT>,
- "orientationReversed" is an attribute of <formationTT>.
If only the train reverses but not the formation, there is currently no
need to separate two <trainParts>.
In the example of Eschwege with one MU, only the train reverses but not
the formation. So until today: No need for two <trainParts>.
---
With your suggestion to _enforce_ two train parts if a train reverses
(which I would welcome as mentioned in the previous post), the situation
changes:
We could now declare "trainReverse" being obsolete since we could always
use "orientationReversed" (also for single MUs by definition) because we
always will have to have a new <trainPart>.
So: If your suggestion will be accepted (by Joachim and others), I
herewith plead for declaring "trainReverse" obsolete to reduce redundancy.
Best regards,
Dirk.
|
|
|
|
|
RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
|
|
Re: RFE for connection, DE:Anschluss
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 03 21:05:09 CET 2024
|