Re: switchType IS vs. IL [message #2118 is a reply to message #2100] |
Sat, 26 January 2019 05:01 |
Joerg von Lingen
Messages: 148 Registered: May 2011
|
Senior Member |
|
|
@switchType in <switchIL> removed
Joerg von Lingen wrote on 16.01.2019 12:16:
> Dear all,
>
> currently we have an attribute switchType in IS and IL which seem to be redundant. For the purpose in IL to distinguish
> particluar relations we have found the following matches to IS making the attribute unnecessary in IL:
>
> simpleSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch without relatedMovableElement
> simpleSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch + relatedMovableElement (derailer)
> coupledSwitch <=> ordinarySwitch/insideCurvedSwitch/outsideCurvedSwitch + relatedMovableElement (switch)
> doubleSlipSwitch <=> doubleSwitchCrossing
> singleSlipSwitch <=> simpleSwitchCrossing
>
> Would you agree to remove the switchType in IL?
>
|
|
|