Forum: railml.interlocking » [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC

Home » railML newsgroups » railml.interlocking » [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC (defining RBC properties and RBC controlled area)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC [message #2487 is a reply to message #2442]

Mon, 06 July 2020 16:28

christian.rahmig
Messages: 447
Registered: January 2016

Senior Member

Dear all,

railML 3.2 shall contain an option to model Radio Block Centers (RBC). After we discussed required parameters in the ETCS use case working group, we now face the central question: shall we add RBC in infrastructure or interlocking/signalling domain? What does the community think about it?

Any comments are highly appreciated...

Best regards
Christian

Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[railML3] Suggested extension for RBC By: Karl-Friedemann Jerosch on Wed, 13 May 2020 18:06
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC By: Henrik Roslund on Thu, 14 May 2020 15:11
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC By: Jörg von Lingen on Tue, 19 May 2020 09:29
		Re: [railML3] Suggested extension for RBC By: christian.rahmig on Mon, 06 July 2020 16:28

Previous Topic:	[railML3.2]: AssetsForInterlocking
Next Topic:	interlocking -> signalling

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jul 22 21:34:17 CEST 2024