I appreciate Torben's idea of fusing the approaches of the generic <area> and the OCP's informationArea. What does the community think about it? And secondly, is it sufficient to have the OCP's informationArea implemented with railML 2.6 (like planned for the generic <area> element)?
Any comments are very much welcome...
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org