Re: [railML2] extension suggestion for the element <state> for working zones [message #2801 is a reply to message #2792] |
Fri, 30 July 2021 19:03 |
christian.rahmig
Messages: 465 Registered: January 2016
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear all,
following adaptations linked with Trac ticket #393 (re-naming <area> into <genericArea> and introducing <workingArea> etc.) [1] I updated railML 2.5 solution proposal for the additional running time in Trac ticket #395 [2]. Please review and let us know if you discover issues to be discussed / corrected / adapted...
Further, one of the two challenges mentioned in my previous post remains and awaits your qualified feedback:
* A direction dependency as modelled with <additionalRunningTime>@dir is not feasible with areas that span over several tracks having different directions. How to cope with this situation?
Any kind of example or comment is highly appreciated...
[1] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/393
[2] https://trac.railml.org/ticket/395
Best regards
Christian
Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
|
|
|