Home » railML newsgroups » railML.infrastructure » Missing attributes and maybe elements in railML3.2 for RTCI-a
Re: Missing attributes and maybe elements in railML3.2 for RTCI-a [message #3276 is a reply to message #3145] Mon, 12 August 2024 13:50 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
christian.rahmig is currently offline  christian.rahmig
Messages: 465
Registered: January 2016
Senior Member
Dear all,

following my forum posting from October there has not been any further feedback or feature request. Therefore, I suggest the following solution for railML 3.3 implementation of element <overCrossing>:

* add attribute @resistanceFactorPassenger to describe the tunnel resistance factor valid for passenger trains running through this tunnel
* add attribute @resistanceFactorFreight to describe the tunnel resistance factor valid for freight trains running through this tunnel.

The proposed solution is documented in the Git issue https://development.railml.org/railml/version3/-/issues/563


christian.rahmig wrote on Wed, 18 October 2023 17:33
...
(1) tunnel resistance
Adding the attributes @resistanceFactorPassenger and @resistanceFactorFreight to element <overCrossing> seems to be a straightforward adaptation of railML 3 data model [1]. However, it is only half of the solution railML 2.5 provides, where a tunnel resistance can also be calculated from wall material and tunnel cross-section. So, dear community, are you fine with just the tunnel resistance factors, or do you need wall material and tunnel cross-section, too?
Best regards


Christian Rahmig – Infrastructure scheme coordinator
railML.org (Registry of Associations: VR 5750)
Altplauen 19h; 01187 Dresden; Germany www.railML.org
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Level crossing with extended information
Next Topic: [railML3] Tunnel infrastructure
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 02 15:11:05 CEST 2024